>-- The Garden of Forking Paths --<
Home
January 14, 2010
Physics is now complete.
No mention in the article about determinism, but the details are
here
.
By
Jan 14, 2010 9:58:37 AM
NEXT POST
Formulating PAP
I’ve recently become puzzled about the best way to formulate the Principle of Alternative Possibilities (PAP). Almost everyone follows Frankfurt (1969) who puts it like this: “a person is morally responsible for what he has done only if he could...
PREVIOUS POST
FlashForward: Can the Future Be Changed?
The ABC prime time sci-fi series FlashForward deals entertainingly with free will, fatalism, time and the future, even if the starting premise is a tad implausible: the whole world blacks out for 2 minutes 17 seconds, during which people see...
1
Following
3
Followers
Search
Recent Comments
Justin Coates:
I appreciate the support. I also appreciate th...
|
more »
On
The Future of the Garden
Mike Robertson:
I thank everyone who has kept this blog going o...
|
more »
On
The Future of the Garden
John Fischer:
In a garden, you have to nip some things in the...
|
more »
On
The Future of the Garden
And, on a different note, Hollywood plans another movie about free will, but this one looks like it will be much funnier than Minority Report:
http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/01/zach_galifianakis_to_grant_pau.html
Posted by: Eddy Nahmias | January 14, 2010 at 10:48 AM
Did they discover the intrinsic phenomenal properties?
Posted by: Michael Drake | January 14, 2010 at 07:18 PM
Hi Manuel,
For the record, Sukekatsu Ushioda is a provocative and popular physics professor who studied at Dartmouth and Penn and spent 25 years in the U.S. He went back to Japan to shake up their university systems. He likes the "wild and crazy" ideas and attitudes of American scientists. He says being wild and crazy may be related to being creative. He's right. This is the essence of my free will model, as you know.
Here is a link to an interview with Ushioda.
________________
As to determinism in physics, I assume you mean pre-determinism and not the adequate determinism we have for macroscopic objects.
Astrophysicist Arthur Stanley Eddington claimed in 1928 that quantum indeterminacy marked the end of strict physical determinism. Writing up his Gifford Lectures of 1927, Eddington announced "It is a consequence of the advent of the quantum theory that physics is no longer pledged to a scheme of deterministic law."
Determinism has been "expelled from present-day physics," he declared, so that "it is no longer necessary to suppose that human actions are completely predetermined."
He went even farther and enthusiastically identified indeterminism with freedom of the will, but Eddington had no specific model and he was roundly criticized by his philosopher contemporaries who said that his indeterminism would made our actions random.
______________
The standard argument against libertarian free will claims that free will cannot be reconciled with (pre)determinism or with indeterminism. If the former, we are not free. If the latter, our actions are random and thus not willed by us.
But David Hume successfully reconciled freedom (and liberty) with determinism to give us freedom of action.
More importantly, R.E.Hobart reconciled free will with determination to give us freedom of the will.
On the indeterminism side, twelve philosophers and scientists, starting with William James in 1884, have reconciled free will with indeterminism (and with an adequate determinism).
We now have a model for the physics and biology of free will.
It explains human creativity and the creativity of evolution.
A similar cosmic process accounts for the creation of information structures in the universe, from galaxies to stars and planets.
Indeterminism guarantees that the future is open. There are genuine ambiguous futures that you and I get to choose.
Physics itself is open, and thus unlikely ever to be "complete," as the tongue in your cheek suggests you realize.
Posted by: Bob Doyle | January 17, 2010 at 08:02 AM