Search the Garden

Jorge Luis Borges

  • "Under the trees of England I meditated on this lost and perhaps mythical labyrinth. I imagined it untouched and perfect on the secret summit of some mountain; I imagined it drowned under rice paddies or beneath the sea; I imagined it infinite, made not only of eight-sided pavilions and of twisting paths but also of rivers, provinces and kingdoms. I thought of a maze of mazes, of a sinuous, ever growing maze which would take in both past and future and would somehow involve the stars."
Powered by TypePad

Comments RSS Feeds

« Should we Care About The Individuation of Action? | Main | Conference: Freedom, Will, and Nature »

August 18, 2006

Conference

The following conference will be of interest to many Gardeners.

Call for papers
SELFHOOD, NORMATIVITY, AND CONTROL
Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands
May 10-11, 2007
Keynote speakers: David Velleman and Susan Hurley
It is a basic folk intuition that genuine agency can be distinguished from mere bodily movement in virtue of an agent's capacity to be in control of their behaviour. This intuition is also central to many traditional philosophical accounts of human agency, no matter how diverse they may be in other respects. Central features such as agential authority, or selfhood, and acting for a reason, or normativity, are often thought to imply some important kind of control. An agent's actions are considered to be hers in virtue of the agent's being in control of her actions. And an action is done for a reason in virtue of the agent's capacity to bring her behaviour under normative constraints.
Recent developments in experimental psychology, however, raise questions about this intuition. Experimental work suggests that for at least some types of behaviour, our trusted notion of conscious control does not do any explanatory work. These new results force philosophers and psychologists alike to rethink the traditional picture of human agency with its key notions of selfhood, normativity, and (indeed) control. In particular, do we need the concept of control to make sense of selfhood and normativity, or can we do without? If we can't do without it, which revisions of the traditional idea of control do we need?
We invite those who would wish to contribute to the conference to send us an abstract of their paper before October 1, 2006. Decisions about the conference programme will be made by November 1, 2006. We will be able to offer those invited to present a paper accommodation in Nijmegen for three nights and we are trying to get additional funds for covering travel reimbursement.

Abstracts to Jan Bransen:

Professor of Philosophy
Behavioural Science Institute
Radboud University Nijmegen
P.O. Box 9104
6500 HE Nijmegen
Netherlands
Phone: + 31 24 - 361 18 17
Fax: + 31 24 - 361 62 11

Email: j.bransen@pwo.ru.nl
Website: http://www.ru.nl/pwo/bransen/

(Hat tip: David Hunter).

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.